Legal Opinion

Mills Land & Water Co. v. Golden West Refining Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 30, 1986No. G002451PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, J.

This appeal concerns several measures taken by the trial court as a result of its determination an attorney in this litigation violated rule 7-103 of the California Rules of Professional Conduct (rule 7-103). The rule provides: “A member of the State Bar shall not communicate directly or indirectly with a party whom he knows to be represented by counsel upon a subject of controversy, without the express consent of such counsel. This rule shall not apply to communications with a public officer, board, committee or body.”

Here, the party affected is a corporation. Opposing…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. Papanicolaou v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  3. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Lewis v. Telephone Employees Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. United States of America, Robin L. Harris v. Virgilio TalaoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API