Mills Land & Water Co. v. Golden West Refining Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SONENSHINE, J.
This appeal concerns several measures taken by the trial court as a result of its determination an attorney in this litigation violated rule 7-103 of the California Rules of Professional Conduct (rule 7-103). The rule provides: “A member of the State Bar shall not communicate directly or indirectly with a party whom he knows to be represented by counsel upon a subject of controversy, without the express consent of such counsel. This rule shall not apply to communications with a public officer, board, committee or body.”
Here, the party affected is a corporation. Opposing…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- In Re Complex Asbestos LitigationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Papanicolaou v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Lewis v. Telephone Employees Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States of America, Robin L. Harris v. Virgilio TalaoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.