Mojica v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER1
LETTOW, Judge.
Four years ago, this court affirmed a special master’s decision dismissing a vaccine claim by petitioners because the claim was filed several days after the applicable statute of limitations had expired. Mojica v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 79 Fed.Cl. 633 (2007), aff'd, 287 Fed.Appx. 103 (Fed.Cir.2008), cert. denied sub nom. Mojica v. Sebelius, - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 2455, 174 *97L.Ed.2d 227 (2009). Petitioners’ failure to meet the filing deadline was attributable to errors by Federal Express, which twice lost their petition while transporting it to the…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wagstaff v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Begley v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Chitlik v. HhsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2026
- Hodge v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019