Legal Opinion

Scheidler v. Brochstein

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 29, 1934No. 10002PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice. .

The appellant sought damages of the ap>-pellees, Mr. and Mrs. Brochstein, for slander as a result of Mrs. Broehstein’s having spoken in the presence of Anna Dahlgren, another waitress therein, and Mrs. Herman Rosenberg, wife of one of the ownel-s, to the appellant in the café where she- was employed, these words:

“I want you fired from here — I don’t want you to work — You got a disease and you are going to spread it around here — and give it to my husband.”

Anna Dahlgren did not hear the words, but Mrs. Rosenberg did; there being no- other customers in the café at the time…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. RichmondTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Mayo v. GoldmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  3. Allen v. EarnestCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Miles v. Record Publishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mason v. FunderburkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  2. Buck v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Bell Publshing Co. v. Garrett Engineering Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Gulf Construction Company v. MottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Bell Pub. Co. v. Garrett Engineering Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API