Legal Opinion

Mayo v. Goldman

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 11, 1909PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Lamar County. Tried below before Hon. T. D. Montrose.

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, Chief Justice.

Appellee was the president and man-' ager of the Goldman Grocer Company, a concern engaged in a wholesale grocery business in the city of Paris. Appellant was an employe of said company—as “utility man,” he testified. His duty, it seems, was to keep his employer advised as to its stock and the market price of goods it handled. One Webber was a traveling salesman for dealers in grocers’ specialties, including pickles, preserves, etc. In June, 1904, while in Paris, Webber endeavored to sell to appellant as the manager of the Goldman Grocer Company a carload of pickles,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. RichmondTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Fowles v. . BowenNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. A. H. Belo & Co. v. FullerTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Irwin v. CookTexas Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Texas Disposal Systems Landfill, Inc. v. Waste Management Holdings, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2007
  2. Floyd E. McDowell v. The State of Texas, Texas Board of Mental Health and Mental RetardationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Buck v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. Houston Belt & Terminal Railway Co. v. WherryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Bolling v. Baker, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API