Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Estate of Kisling

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1945No. Civ. 14691PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This is an appeal from a decree denying a purported holographic will admission to probate. Appellant Albert E. Loomis, a nephew of decedent, offered the following document for probate as her last will and testament:

“Rosslyn Hotels 111 West Fifth Street Los Angeles, California
“May 24—1943
“Mr. R. B. Bidwell Atty
“Dear Mr. Bidwell:
“I am Serious 111 my Dr. asks me to tell you to Come in and make out a new will I have not been fair to my nephew'.visit I Albert E. Loomis I wish him to have all my Personal properties, and all securities all of my Jewelry—my nephew lives in Fifield Wisconsin he now…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Estate of ButtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. In Re Estate of MajorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  3. Cedars of Lebanon Hospital v. PagelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Harding v. KeppnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. Richardson v. BeebeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Estate of SpiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Treaster v. HamlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. United States v. Orlando Gutierrez AcostaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API