Legal Opinion

Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Scarlett

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1989No. 17441PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Chief Justice.

This is a declaratory judgment action under the uninsured/underinsured motorist provision of an automobile insurance policy. The facts relevant to the insurance claim are undisputed. On May 8, 1986, the insured, Gary O. Scarlett (Scarlett) purchased from Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide) an automobile insurance policy insuring four specified vehicles. Scarlett’s policy provided uninsured/under-insured motorist coverage for each of the four vehicles in the amount of $100,000 per person, $300,000 per occurrence. On July 8, 1986, Scarlett’s two daughters,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Meckert v. Transamerica InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Blackburn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Russell v. State Automobile Mutual InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Upshaw v. Trinity CompaniesTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Howard v. Oregon Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Vincent v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API