Legal Opinion
Aerovox Corporation v. Polymet Mfg. Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 11, 1933No. 29PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
This is the usual suit in equity for. the infringement of a patent for a method of making a dielectric condenser and for the condenser so made. The art had made such condensers in the past by winding alternate sheets of tin-foil and paper into a cartridge or cylinder, and attaching one terminal to one sheet of foil, and the other, to the second, the paper being the dielectric. The difficulties with this were that though the cartridge was heavily compressed, there would remain air spaces which caused “breakdowns.” To correct this the whole cartridge while in the press…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Elizabeth v. Pavement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Smith & Griggs Manufacturing Co. v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Hall v. MacNealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Root v. Third Avenue RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- A. Schrader's Sons v. Wein Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Metallizing Engineering Co. v. Kenyon Bearing & Auto Parts Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
- In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Sauquoit Fibers Company v. Leesona Corporation, Kayser-Roth Corporation (In Its Own Name and D/B/A Kayser-Roth Hosiery Companyand Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co., Inc.) v. Leesona Corporation, Leesona Corporation v. The Duplan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Anthony J. Cali v. Eastern Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Gilbert Shaw and Polymers, Inc. v. E. B. & A. C. Whiting CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Barry v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.