Nashua Hospital Ass'n v. Gage
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtPeaslee, C. J.
Objection is made that the defendant’s claim is not a cloud upon the title of the plaintiff in any event, and that therefore the bill does not lie. If the restrictions are in force as claimedAby the defendants, they constitute an encumbrance upon the plaintiff’s property. Foster v. Foster, 62 N. H. 46. Whether they are now or ever have been in force as between these parties, depends in part upon facts not shown by the recorded conveyances. The present proceeding is an appropriate one in which to have the facts found and a decree entered which will clear up the present indefinite state of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Evans v. FossMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Sprague v. KimballMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Batchelor v. . HinkleNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Loud v. PendergastMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Arthur Young & Co. v. SutherlandDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Southwest Petroleum Co. v. LoganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Chasan v. Village District of EastmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
- Traficante v. PopeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- Heston v. OuslerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.