Legal Opinion

United States v. Jack Aponte

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 7, 1978No. 77-2735PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

Jack Aponte was convicted by a jury of violating 18 U.S.C. § 3150 (jumping bail). On appeal, he asserts a variety of irregularities, but the only two issues that require discussion are whether the trial judge erred in finding Aponte competent to stand trial and whether the judge improperly allowed Aponte to represent himself without an effective waiver of his right to counsel.

Some three years after Aponte had failed to appear for sentencing in the District of Arizona upon a conviction arising out of his possession of a controlled substance, he was arrested in California…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. The United States of America v. Ronald Paul DujanovicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. United States v. Floyd BaloughCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. City of Bellevue v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. United States v. James David KimmelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  4. Richard Allan Moran v. Salvador Godinez, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Erik D. ErskineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API