United States v. James David Kimmel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
James David Kimmel appeals his convictions for distributing and conspiring to distribute LSD in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. We reach only two issues at this stage of the appeal. First, we hold that Kimmel did not receive the benefits of his constitutional right to legal representation at his trial. Second, we hold that the record does not show that he made a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to counsel. Because the district court may be able to supply additional information about Kimmel’s understanding at the time of the waiver, we remand to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. Gary HalbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- The United States of America v. Ronald Paul DujanovicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Marvin L. Cooley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Francis E. Gillings and Ruth GillingsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez Celestino Orlando Estevez Amado Raphael Leon Adalberto Herrera and Menelao Orlando EstevezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- People v. BloomCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- United States v. William Stewart McDowellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Ishmael GallopCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.