Legal Opinion

State v. Pletz

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided September 12, 2000No. 98-2455PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWedemeyer, P.J.

¶ 1. Eric A. Pletz appeals from an order for commitment entered in a Wis. STAT. ch. 980 proceeding after a jury found he was a "sexually violent person," as that term is used in Wis. STAT. § 980.01(7). He claims that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's finding that he was a sexually violent person; (2) the jury was improperly instructed regarding the unanimity requirement; (3) the trial court erred in refusing Pletz's request to strike certain testimony as a discovery sanction; and (4) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting hearsay. Because the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wold v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  2. State v. LenarchickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Holland v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Manson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. CurielWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wisconsin v. LaxtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Arents v. ANR Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
  3. State v. SchulpiusCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  4. State v. SchulpiusCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  5. Wisconsin v. LaxtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API