State v. Pletz
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtWedemeyer, P.J.
¶ 1. Eric A. Pletz appeals from an order for commitment entered in a Wis. STAT. ch. 980 proceeding after a jury found he was a "sexually violent person," as that term is used in Wis. STAT. § 980.01(7). He claims that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the jury's finding that he was a sexually violent person; (2) the jury was improperly instructed regarding the unanimity requirement; (3) the trial court erred in refusing Pletz's request to strike certain testimony as a discovery sanction; and (4) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting hearsay. Because the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Wold v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- State v. LenarchickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Holland v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
- Manson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. CurielWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wisconsin v. LaxtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- Arents v. ANR Pipeline Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2005
- State v. SchulpiusCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- State v. SchulpiusCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- Wisconsin v. LaxtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002