Legal Opinion

O. Gene Bicknell v. Richard M. Silanskas, Jr., Larry K. Wilhite, and Stephen D. Hedrick

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided May 5, 2026No. 4:25-cv-00383Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA O. GENE BICKNELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 25-cv-00383-SH RICHARD M. SILANSKAS, JR., LARRY ) K. WILHITE, and STEPHEN D. ) HEDRICK, ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are the motions to dismiss of Defendants Larry K. Wilhite and Stephen D. Hedrick.1 Having considered the parties’ briefing, the Court finds Plaintiff has failed to state a pattern of racketeering activity, a necessary element of his RICO claims. The RICO claims, therefore, will be dismissed. The motions are otherwise denied. I.…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Boyle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API