Legal Opinion

Munoz v. Maschner

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1979No. 4973PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant-petitioner appeals pro se1 from an order of the district court dismissing his petition for post-conviction' relief.2 In his original petition and in this appeal, appellant asserts he was entitled to relief for these reasons:(1) The jury did not return a verdict which determined the value of the property stolen as required by § 7-11-502, W.S.1977.(2) The court failed to instruct and ask the jury to return a verdict as to petitioner’s status as an habitual offender.(3) The trial court erred in sentencing him under the grand larceny statute when he was not tried, convicted and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Spencer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. State v. HoffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Levell v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
  5. State v. MaldonadoArizona Supreme Court · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Cutbirth v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Hopkinson v. District Court, Teton CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Chavez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Pote v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Hoggatt v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API