Legal Opinion

State v. Maldonado

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1962No. 1240PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Vice Chief Justice.

Ernest Paul Maldonado stands convicted of first degree burglary. His sole “ground of appeal” 1 is predicated .on the fact that 79 days elapsed between his arrest on March 8, 1961 and his first 2 pre liminary hearing on May 29, 1961. Specifically he contends that the delay, without more, violated his right to a “speedy” trial under the Arizona Constitution (ARIZ. CONST. art. 2, § 24, A.R.S.) and deprived him of that due process of law guaranteed him by Article 2, section 4 of the Arizona Constitution and the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.

Secti…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Stroble v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Lyons v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  3. State v. CaffeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. Munoz v. MaschnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Bobby Favors v. Frank a.eyman, Warden, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API