State v. Maldonado
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
UDALL, Vice Chief Justice.
Ernest Paul Maldonado stands convicted of first degree burglary. His sole “ground of appeal” 1 is predicated .on the fact that 79 days elapsed between his arrest on March 8, 1961 and his first 2 pre liminary hearing on May 29, 1961. Specifically he contends that the delay, without more, violated his right to a “speedy” trial under the Arizona Constitution (ARIZ. CONST. art. 2, § 24, A.R.S.) and deprived him of that due process of law guaranteed him by Article 2, section 4 of the Arizona Constitution and the 14th Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.
Secti…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Stroble v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Lyons v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
- State v. CaffeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Munoz v. MaschnerWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Bobby Favors v. Frank a.eyman, Warden, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.