Legal Opinion
German v. Killeen
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided August 25, 1980No. Civ. 78-70217PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS IN PART
COHN, District Judge.
I
Before the Court are defendants’ (with the exception of defendant Killeen) motions to dismiss plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint on the grounds that plaintiff has failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). 1
Defendants claim plaintiff’s allegations are insufficient to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985(3) and 1986, and they are immune from suit.
Jurisdiction is based on 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (original jurisdiction…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Lutheran Day Care v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Forshey v. JacksonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
- Davey v. TomlinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
- CPC International, Inc. v. Aerojet-General Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
- Jeetendra Bhandari v. First National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.