Legal Opinion

Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1967No. 10659PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLETT, Justice:

The defendant Joseph Higginson was injured while working for plaintiff Morrison-Knudsen Construction Company. The Industrial Commission of Utah ordered compensation to be paid by Morrison-Knudsen’s insurance carrier, Employers Mutual of Wausau, on the basis of fifty per cent disability of the injured employee based on the report of the medical advisory board. The plaintiffs did not object to the award. *392The employee requested that the matter be referred to a medical panel for a report to the Industrial Commission pursuant to the provisions of Section 35-1-77, U.C.A.1953 as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kent v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  2. United Park City Mines Company v. PrescottUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Kelly v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Utah Copper Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Tintic Standard Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Entwistle Co. v. WilkinsUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Rooney v. CharlesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Marshall v. INDUS. COM'N OF STATE OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Hardman v. Salt Lake City Fleet ManagementUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Entwistle Co. v. WilkinsUtah Supreme Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API