In re Hoadley
District Court, S.D. New York
In Bankruptcy. On review of decision of referee in bankruptcy.
1Opinion of the Court
BBOWN, District Judge.
The trustee in the above matter petitioned for an order that the bankrupts, Russell H. Hoadley, Jr., and Chester C. Munroe, should transfer to him their interests in certain estates devised under the wills of Russell H. Hoadley, Sr., and Chester Clark and Sarah S. Munroe, hereinafter referred to. For the bankrupts it is claimed that neither of them had any transferable interest in the estates or any estate that could be levied upon or sold under judicial process, and none, therefore, which passes to the trustee under section 70 of the bankrupt act. The following is the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Moore v. LittelNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Leffingwell v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
- Baer v. HendricksNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Forsyth v. HammondSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Smith v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Higgins v. WashburnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- Earle v. MaxwellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
- Cullom v. KearnsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1925
- In re TwaddellDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1901
- Suskin & Berry, Inc. v. RumleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.