Legal Opinion

State v. . Oxendine

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 3, 1945PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScheNck, J.

The first group _of assignments of error set out in appellant’s brief is presented under the first question posed in his brief, namely: “Did the Court err in admission of testimony offered by the State?”

The first of these assignments relates to the testimony of the prosecuting witness Warriax that “there were approximately 150 shot in' his head.” The defendant objected to the testimony and moved to strike it from the record. The court overruled the objection as well as the motion to strike, and defendant excepted. The defendant bases his exception upon the theory that the witness had formerly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. Exum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. State v. . LefeversSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. State v. . HudsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Morgan v. Hood Ex Rel. Page Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. MintonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  4. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. BirchfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API