Legal Opinion

Howard v. Village of Chisholm

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 1934No. 29,800PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLT, Justice.

The appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion in the alternative for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.

Defendant, a municipal corporation, maintains a community building wherein hockey and other games are played. It appears that admission is free to the players and to spectators. On the west side of the building, about six feet above the ice^was a balcony for the spectators, containing six tiers of seats. The front tier was protected by a railing about 30 inches high, made of one and one-half-inch gas pipe, one at the top and one half way down. These…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wells v. Minneapolis Baseball & Athletic Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  2. Emmons v. City of VirginiaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  3. Schofield v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  4. Guilmartin v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  5. Carey v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Churchill v. Pearl River Basin Dev. Dist.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Propper v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  3. Schoening v. United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Diker v. City of St. Louis ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  5. Gillies v. City of MinneapolisDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API