Lomas, R. v. Kravitz, J.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
PANELLA, J.
This appeal concerns two phases of the underlying trial: the liability verdict and the damages assessment. As detailed below, the entire Court affirms the liability verdict entered by the Honorable Thomas -P. Rogers of the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County. Accordingly, our holding and reasoning in that regard is binding and precedential. See Commonwealth v. Brown, 23 A.3d 544, 556 (Pa.Super.2011) (ere banc). The reasoning for our affirmance of the liability verdict follows these introductory words.
■ The damages verdict is affirmed by an equally divided Court.…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- United States v. Joseph Conforte and Sally ConforteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Lomas Sr., R. v. Kravitz, J., Aplts.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- B.G. Balmer & Co. v. Frank Crystal & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Berg, D. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Accurso v. Infra-Red Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.