Legal Opinion

Stelts v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 14, 1984No. C 83-01-30170; CA A28588PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.

Petitioner appeals from an order denying him post-conviction relief. He contends that his guilty plea should be set aside, because he did not knowingly waive his right of confrontation. We hold that he did not validly waive this right but, because he did not demonstrate that he suffered any prejudice, he is not entitled to post-conviction relief. Accordingly, we affirm.

In June, 1979, petitioner pled guilty to driving under the influence of intoxicants. At the time of the hearing on the plea, the court advised him of his right to be represented by counsel, his right to a jury trial, his right…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Dixon v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Miller v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Boag v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. Harris v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stelts v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Haynes v. KeeneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API