Legal Opinion
Dye v. Burdick
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided July 18, 1977No. 77-6Published
1Opinion of the Court
553 S.W.2d 833 (1977)
Herman DYE et ux., Appellants,
v.
Fred R. BURDICK et ux., Appellees.
No. 77-6.
Supreme Court of Arkansas, In Banc.
July 18, 1977.
Howard L. Slinkard, Rogers, for appellants.
Little, Lawrence, McCollum & Mixon by Sidney H. McCollum, Bentonville, for appellees.
FOGLEMAN, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment on a verdict directed against appellants Herman Dye and his wife, whose home was destroyed by flooding which resulted from the bursting of a dam on property owned by appellees. We agree with appellants that a verdict should not have been directed upon the conclusion of the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Eaves v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Fleming v. LockwoodMontana Supreme Court · 1907
- Dollins v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Dye v. BurdickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- City Water Power Co. v. City of Fergus FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.