Legal Opinion

Dye v. Burdick

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 18, 1977No. 77-6PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

John A. Fogleman, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment on a verdict directed against appellants Herman Dye and his wife, whose home was destroyed by flooding which resulted from the bursting of a dam on property owned by appellees. We agree with appellants that a verdict should not have been directed upon the conclusion of the evidence on behalf of the appellant-plaintiffs.

Sometime in the 1960’s, Clifford Mills contracted with a contractor to build a stock pond or small lake on a farm he owned in Benton County, by building an earthen dam across a narrow hollow or ravine which constituted…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mayor of New-York v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1845
  2. Fleming v. LockwoodMontana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Dollins v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. City Water Power Co. v. City of Fergus FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Anderson v. Rucker Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1919

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sprecher v. Adamson CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Zero Wholesale Gas Co., Inc. v. StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  4. Bunyak v. Clyde J. Yancey & Sons Dairy, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Lewis v. Texas Utilities Electric Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API