Dye v. Burdick
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment on a verdict directed against appellants Herman Dye and his wife, whose home was destroyed by flooding which resulted from the bursting of a dam on property owned by appellees. We agree with appellants that a verdict should not have been directed upon the conclusion of the evidence on behalf of the appellant-plaintiffs.
Sometime in the 1960’s, Clifford Mills contracted with a contractor to build a stock pond or small lake on a farm he owned in Benton County, by building an earthen dam across a narrow hollow or ravine which constituted…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mayor of New-York v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1845
- Fleming v. LockwoodMontana Supreme Court · 1907
- Dollins v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- City Water Power Co. v. City of Fergus FallsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Anderson v. Rucker Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Sprecher v. Adamson CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Zero Wholesale Gas Co., Inc. v. StroudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
- Bunyak v. Clyde J. Yancey & Sons Dairy, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Lewis v. Texas Utilities Electric Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.