Legal Opinion

Sam Forwand Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 6, 1956No. C. D. 1829PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wilson, Judge:

It has been stipulated between the parties to this action that the involved merchandise in this case consists of undressed fox skins and that plaintiff’s illustrative exhibits 1 through 11 are representative of the furs under consideration by the court. The pelts under review were classified by the collector under paragraph 1519 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement with Canada, T. D. 51647, as “Silver or black fox furs or skins, dressed or undressed, not specially provided for,” at the rate of 37% per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff contends that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. FloryCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  2. Brager-Larsen v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Mink Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Art E. Weiss Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  3. Dextar Fur Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  4. Farber v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  5. Farber v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API