Legal Opinion
Crumady v. The Joachim Hendrik Fisser
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 27, 1956No. Civ. A. 1-54PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
This admiralty suit was instituted by libel in rem for damages, civil and maritime, for bodily injuries and their consequences, resulting from the fall of a cargo boom serving hatch No. 1 on the motor vessel Joachim Hendrik Fisser, of German registry, while lying in navigable waters of the United States, within the jurisdiction of this Court, at a pier or bulkhead at Port Newark, New Jersey, on January 2, 1954.
The vessel impleaded as a respondent libellant's employer, Nacirema Operating Co., Inc. (herein called Nacirema), the stevedore contractor which was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Halcyon Lines v. Haenn Ship Ceiling & Refitting Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Alaska Steamship Co. v. PettersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Crumady v. the Joachim Hendrik FisserSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- McKnight v. NM Paterson & Sons, LimitedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1960
- Di Salvo v. Cunard Steamship Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Crumady v. The Joachim Hendrik FisserCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1957
- Considine v. Black Diamond Steamship Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.