Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided September 25, 1981No. ACM S25243PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

Accused, pursuant to his pleas, stands convicted of three specifications of making false official statements in violation of Article 107, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 907. He was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge.

The first error asserted by appellate defense counsel is that the plea was improvident because the specifications do not allege an offense under Article 107 of the Code. They contend that since the accused, during *540the Care inquiry, admitted falsely signing the name of another to the documents in question, the gravamen of the offense…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. DavenportUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  2. United States v. RussoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  3. United States v. NegroneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
  4. United States v. CrossUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. JamesonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991
  2. United States v. RiceU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API