Legal Opinion

State ex rel. City of Madison v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelsoN, J.

The claim of the city of Madison was made pursuant to the provisions of ch. 29, Laws of 1931, special session, and its validity in whole or in part depends upon the proper construction to be given to said chapter.

The city of Madison contends that while sec. 2 (1) unmistakably limits the allotment or distribution thereunder to counties administering outdoor poor relief under the county system and to cities, towns, and villages administering outdoor poor relief under the local system, sec. 2 (2) contains no such limitation; that the language “there shall be paid to counties and cities, towns…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Milwaukee v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Dagan v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Will of Schilling v. SchillingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State ex rel. Thieme v. GregoryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Wisconsin Livestock Ass'n v. BowermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Van Dyke v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Jennings v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. In Re Trust of ParsonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. NicholsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Beckman v. Bemis-Hooper-Hays Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API