Legal Opinion

Dagan v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1916PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Ebeoe to review a judgment of the municipal court of Brown county: N. J. Monaiian, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtKebwin, J.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of having sold intoxicating liquor to one Ohas. Wheelock, an Indian, contrary to the provisions of sec. 1561, Stats. The judgment of conviction was brought here for review by writ of error.

“Section 1561. No person shall sell, barter, give or in any manner dispose of any intoxicating liquor to any Indian or to any mixed-blood Indian, except civilized persons of Indian descent not members of any tribe; and every person so offend*354ing shall for each, offense he punished by a fine not exceeding one hundred dollars or by imprisonment in the county jail not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Farrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. Jorgenson v. City of SuperiorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. People v. LuttermoserMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  4. People v. BrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. GebhardMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rice v. RehnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Tribune Co. v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Nebraska State Railway Commission v. Alfalfa Butter Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  4. State v. CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  5. State v. RorvickIdaho Supreme Court · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API