O'Connell v. Behan
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a petition for a writ of mandate. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLennon, P. J.
The preamble of article XII of the charter of the city and county of San Francisco declares that it is “the purpose and intention of the people of the city and county of San Francisco that its public utilities shall be gradually acquired and ultimately owned by the city and county”; and with this purpose in view it is provided by section 1 of the same article that “whenever the board of supervisors by ordinance . . . shall determine that the public interest or necessity demands the acquisition, construction or completion of any public utility or utilities by the city and county, or whenever…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Platner v. VincentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Ray v. American Photo Player Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- California Employment Commission v. Arrow Mill Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Ramacciotti v. RamacciottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Carter v. SillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.