Legal Opinion
Einspahr v. Exchange National Bank
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided November 5, 1896No. 6819PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Error from the district court of Adams county. Tried below before Beall, J.
1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.
The petition in error must be dismissed, for the reason the transcript of the proceedings and judgment filed in this court is not authenticated by the clerk of the court below. (City of Brownville v. Middleton, 1 Neb., 10; Ward v. Urmson, 40 Neb., 695; Moore v. Waterman, 40 Neb., 498; Baker v. Kloster, 41 Neb., 890; Garneau v. Omaha Printing Co., 42 Neb., 847; McDonald v. Grabow, 46 Neb., 406; Otis v. Butters, 46 Neb., 492.)
Dismissed.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moore v. WatermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- Ward v. UrmsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
- McDonald v. GrabowNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- City of Brownville v. MiddletonNebraska Supreme Court · 1871
- Garneau v. Omaha Printing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- P. Brockman Commission Co. v. SangNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
- Bailey v. EastmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1898