Legal Opinion

P. Brockman Commission Co. v. Sang

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1897No. 7535PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from the district court of Butler county. Tried below before Wheeler, J.

1Opinion of the CourtNorval, J.

This petition in error must be dismissed, for the reason the same is predicated upon a transcript which is not properly authenticated by the clerk of the trial court. The certificate of that officer appended to the transcript merely authenticates the pleadings included therein, as being true copies of the originals filed in the case. The proceedings in the court below and the judgment sought to be reviewed are in no manner mentioned in said certificate or otherwise authenticated. Section 586 of '’the Code of Civil Procedure requires the plaintiff in error to file with his petition “a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moore v. WatermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  2. McDonald v. GrabowNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Otis v. ButtersNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. McDonald v. PennistonNebraska Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Einspahr v. Exchange National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Anania v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Slobodisky v. CurtisNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  3. First National Bank v. NobleNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Finn v. WhittenNebraska Supreme Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API