Legal Opinion
Wietzel v. Lacy
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 10, 1930No. Patent Appeal 2257PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.
The Examiner declared an interference in this ease, the subject-matter being contained in two- counts which read as follows:
“Count 1. The process of manufacturing formamide which consists in acting on an aliphatic alcohol with carbon monoxid and ammonia, at a higher pressure than atmospheric pressure.
“Count 2. The process of manufacturing formamide which consists in acting on methanol with carbon monoxid and ammonia in the presence of metal alcohólate, at a pressure exceeding- atmospheric pressure.”
Wietzel filed his application in the United States Patent Office May 20, 1925, and patent No.…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Christie v. SeyboldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1893
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Aluminate Corp. v. Permutit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Euth v. OliverCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
- Nystrom v. MancusoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Rhinevault v. PfiesterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Carl W. Walter v. George R. RyanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.