Legal Opinion
Ætna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford v. Wertheimer
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 28, 1933No. 731PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
This litigation arises out of the death of one David L. Wertheimer, tke circumstances of which are detailed in Wertheimer v. Travelers’ Protective Association (C. C. A.) 64 F.(2d) 435, this day decided.
The appellant issued to the deceased a life insurance policy containing a double indemnity provision in case of accidental death. This action is for the double indemnity, the insurance on the life having been paid without controversy. For this double indemnity, the insured paid an additional annual premium of $17.50. The additional indemnity is payable if death “results…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- German Alliance Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Whitfield v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of HartfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Brunswick v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
- Supreme Council of Royal Arcanum v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Logan v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shell Petroleum Corporation v. HollowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- State of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Williams v. Oklahoma Natural Gas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Denver-Greeley Valley Irr. Dist. v. McNeilCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. BurroughsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Thompson v. New York Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.