Legal Opinion
Lumbermen's Ins. Co. v. Heiner
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 16, 1952No. 5582PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHELPS, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Pima County in favor of. appellee Bernard Heiner, and against appellants Lumbermen’s Insurance Company,. Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company, and Benjamin Solot and Mark Klafter as individuals, in the sum of $536.36 together with interest and costs.
The facts are that Solot and Klafter werecopartners engaged in the real estate and insurance business in Tucson and acted as. agents for the above-named insurance-companies, soliciting various kinds of automobile insurance written by their principals.
For some reason…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. v. R. E. Parsons Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Rice v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1937
- German American Insurance v. DarrinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
- Hayes v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
- Northwestern National Insurance v. ChambersArizona Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Weinisch v. SawyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1991
- Bauman v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Setzer v. OLD REPUBLIC LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. Boyle General Tire Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.