Legal Opinion
Ramstad v. Hodel
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 2, 1985No. 82-3605PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Plaintiff Ramstad brought this action to review a decision of the Interior Board of Land Appeals denying his application to purchase land in Alaska upon which Ram-stad operated a hunting and fishing camp and guide service. The district court granted summary judgment1 in favor of the government defendants, and Ramstad appeals. We disagree in part with the ruling of the district court, and reverse the judgment.
FACTS
For purposes of their motion for summary judgment, the defendants accepted as true the allegations of the complaint. The facts, therefore, are not in material…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Asarco, Inc. v. U. S. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Tarpey v. MadsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Russian-American Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Baker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- Montour v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- In Re FoertschUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. North Dakota · 1994
- David B. Clementson v. William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Richard L. Nevitt v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Montour v. Hartford Life & Acc. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.