Legal Opinion
Concrete Products Co. v. Salt Lake County
Utah Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1987No. 19771PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
Salt Lake County appeals from a judgment holding it liable to Concrete Products for supplies Concrete Products delivered to a subcontractor working on a development in Salt Lake County. Concrete Products cross appeals from the trial court’s denial of recovery on the theory of unjust enrichment. Salt Lake County is not liable to Concrete Products on either theory.
In 1976, a developer submitted a plan for a development in Salt Lake County to the Board of County Commissioners. Pursuant to county ordinance, the Commission offered the developer the option of completing the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rapp v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1974
- Berrett v. StevensUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Breitling Bros. Construction, Inc. v. Utah Golden Spikers, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
3Cited by19 opinions
- American Towers Owners Ass'n v. CCI Mechanical, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1996
- Jeffs v. StubbsUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Cal Wadsworth Construction v. City of St. GeorgeUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- In re Packaged Seafood Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2017
- In re Processed Egg Products Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.