Legal Opinion

Gold v. Gold

Texas Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2004No. 03-0906PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court dismissed Karen Gold’s bill of review because she did not file a restricted appeal first, and the court of appeals affirmed. 111 S.W.3d 799. Because we hold that a restricted appeal is not a prerequisite to a bill of review, we reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.

In February 2000, Karen Gold filed a Petition for Enforcement against her former husband Richard Gold, Jr., and his father Richard Gold, Sr., alleging the former had fraudulently transferred community assets to the latter in violation of the couple’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. George Alexander D/B/A Zentner's Daughter Steakhouse v. Lynda's BoutiqueTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Villarreal v. San Antonio Truck & EquipmentTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Baker v. GoldsmithTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Caldwell v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. General Electric Co. v. Falcon Ridge Apartments, Joint VentureTexas Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Drewery Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Caldwell v. BarnesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Richard M. Ross v. National Center for the Employment of the Disabled, as Successor in Interest to Access Healthsource, Inc., Assignee of O.R. BrookerTexas Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Mabon Ltd. v. Afri-Carib Enterprises, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Ginn v. ForresterTexas Supreme Court · 2009

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API