Legal Opinion

Ginn v. Forrester

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 2009No. 08-0163PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Per curiam

A restricted appeal requires error that is apparent on the face of the record; error that is merely inferred will not suffice. In this case, the clerk’s supplemental record contains a notation that the clerk’s office was unable to locate documents indicating notice was sent or a hearing was held on the trial court’s dismissal for want of prosecution. Construing the notation as affirmative evidence that the trial court failed to provide notice, a divided court of appeals concluded the requirements for a restricted appeal were met. 282 S.W.3d 513. Because the clerk has no affirmative duty to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. George Alexander D/B/A Zentner's Daughter Steakhouse v. Lynda's BoutiqueTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. General Electric Co. v. Falcon Ridge Apartments, Joint VentureTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Gold v. GoldTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Forrester v. Ginn, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. in the Interest of K.M.L., a ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Ex parte VegaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Brown v. Ogbolu, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  4. Mandel v. Lewisville Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
  5. In re the Expunction of M.T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API