Ginn v. Forrester
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
A restricted appeal requires error that is apparent on the face of the record; error that is merely inferred will not suffice. In this case, the clerk’s supplemental record contains a notation that the clerk’s office was unable to locate documents indicating notice was sent or a hearing was held on the trial court’s dismissal for want of prosecution. Construing the notation as affirmative evidence that the trial court failed to provide notice, a divided court of appeals concluded the requirements for a restricted appeal were met. 282 S.W.3d 513. Because the clerk has no affirmative duty to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- George Alexander D/B/A Zentner's Daughter Steakhouse v. Lynda's BoutiqueTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- General Electric Co. v. Falcon Ridge Apartments, Joint VentureTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Gold v. GoldTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Forrester v. Ginn, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
3Cited by93 opinions
- in the Interest of K.M.L., a ChildTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- Ex parte VegaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Brown v. Ogbolu, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
- Mandel v. Lewisville Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
- In re the Expunction of M.T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2016
88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.