Legal Opinion
Eichelberger v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided February 26, 1996No. 95-992PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert H. Dudley, Justice.
Appellants Natal Eichelberger and Johnny Elam, along with two other young men, destroyed property owned by the Lamar School District, United States Corps of Engineers, Gary Hamilton, and Jack Cline, Sr. The juvenile division of chancery court conducted a bifurcated hearing at which it first adjudged appellants to be delinquents and then determined the amount of restitution they are to make. Before the restitution phase of the hearing began, appellants presented a motion in limine asking that restitution be limited to $2,000 for each victim. The basis for the motion…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Beazell v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- United States v. Steven C. StreebingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Dodson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- O'FALLON v. O'Fallon Ex Rel. NgarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
- Allstate Insurance Company v. Mark Burrough, Garnette Bell, Individually and as Next Friend of Kenyatta WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2016
- Laymon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.