Legal Opinion

Metcalf v. Metcalf

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1957No. 33789PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This is an action for divorce instituted by the husband. The complaint alleged cruel treatment rendering plaintiff’s life burdensome to the extent that he removed himself from the marital home. The wife answered, denying cruelty and affirmatively alleging that the husband had left home because he was enamored of another woman, but did not cross-complain for either divorce or separate maintenance. When plaintiff rested his case in chief, the trial court granted defendant’s oral motion that the answer be amended to pray for separate maintenance. At the conclusion of the evidence, the court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Winslow v. MellWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Neff v. NeffWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Detjen v. DetjenWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Thompson v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Best v. BestWashington Supreme Court · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. MetcalfWashington Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Bennett v. BennettWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Fallin v. FallinWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Paulson v. National Indemnity CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Moore v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API