Metcalf v. Metcalf
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
■ Finley, C. J.
— Myrtle Metcalf petitioned the trial court for an increase in her separate maintenance allowance. Soon thereafter, John Metcalf, her husband, brought an action for divorce. The cases were consolidated for trial.
The trial court granted respondent a divorce, decreed a property distribution, and denied appellant’s request for alimony and attorney’s fees. (The petition for an increase for separate maintenance, of course, became moot.)
This action represents respondent’s third attempt to obtain a divorce. The first action, brought in 1949, was dismissed after the parties became…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davis v. SillWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Hokamp v. HokampWashington Supreme Court · 1949
- Kane v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1960
- Ostiguy v. A. F. Franke Construction, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- Bodeneck v. Cater's Motor Freight System, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Arnett v. Seattle General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1964
- State v. AguirreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Impero v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re the Marriage of DalthorpCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
- In RE HENDERSON v. McCulloughWashington Supreme Court · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.