Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Thompson
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1943No. 28703PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.
— Plaintiff brought her action for divorce based on Rem. Rev. Stat, § 982 [P. C. § 7501], subd. 5, being cruel treatment of either party by the other, or personal indignities rendering fife burdensome. After a trial on the merits, the court dismissed her action. Plaintiff appeals.
Appellant, in the opening brief, states:
“There are no claimed errors of law, and the entire issue is an issue of fact; whether the testimony was sufficient. . . . This appeal is promulgated upon the assumption that the testimony at the time of trial, both by the plaintiff and by the defendant, showed ample and…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Neff v. NeffWashington Supreme Court · 1948
- Robuck v. RobuckWashington Supreme Court · 1963
- Detjen v. DetjenWashington Supreme Court · 1952
- Baselt v. BaseltWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Saffer v. SafferWashington Supreme Court · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.