Legal Opinion

Diltz v. Spahr

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 26, 1897No. 1,811PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

The appellee sued the appellant to recover a commission for services in procuring a loan. The original complaint was in one paragraph, and was in the statutory form upon an account stated. With this paragraph the appellee filed, as an exhibit, a bill of particulars as follows:

*592“Indianapolis, Ind., Dec. 24, 1894.

Amos K. Diltz to Wm. H. Spahr, Dr.

To commission securing $8,000.00 loan, $320.00.”

The appellant answered by general denial and the cause was submitted to the court for trial, without the intervention of a jury. After the introduction of all the evidence and the conclusion of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Levy v. ChittendenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Hewitt v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sanders v. HartgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. WalkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Case v. MoormanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. North British & Mercantile Insurance v. RudyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API