Legal Opinion

Case v. Moorman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 4, 1900No. 3,175PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.

—This was an action in replevin in which appellant was plaintiff and appellee defendant. The complaint is in the ordinary form, and as its sufficiency is not questioned no further reference need be made to it. The case was put at issue by an answer in denial and submitted *294to a jury for trial. After the evidence had been heard, the appellee asked and was granted leave to file an additional affirmative paragraph of answer, to which appellant objected and excepted. . To this additional paragraph of answer the apjDellant demurred for want of facts, which demurrer was overruled, and he refused to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bever v. NorthIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Burnett v. MilnesIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. HubbardIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Adams v. MainIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Palmer v. HayesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. HuffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  2. C. H. Maloney & Co. v. WhitneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Spangler v. Armstrong Rubber Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Callan v. SchwingIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API