North British & Mercantile Insurance v. Rudy
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Rush Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.
Suit by appellee against appellant on an insurance policy to recover for a loss sustained by fire; trial by jury; verdict and judgment for appellee.
In their argument counsel for appellant have discussed but three questions: (1) The action of the court in allowing appellee to amend his complaint during the pendency of the trial; (2) the overruling of its motion for a continu*473anee upon the filing of the amended complaint, and (3) the overruling of its motion for a new trial.
The record shows that the jury had been impaneled and the trial commenced. Appellee was the first witness called in his own…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Jeffersonville Water Supply Co. v. RiterIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Chicago & Indiana Coal Railway Co. v. HunterIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. MorganIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Raymond v. WathenIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.