Sue v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
BROOKS, Judge.
This is a conviction for murder in the second degree, the punishment assessed being twenty-five years confinement in the State -penitentiary.
Appellant’s bill of exceptions, No. 5, complains that the court refused to permit his counsel to make a statement to the jury of the facts that he expected to prove on the trial of this cause. Appended to the bill of exceptions is the following qualification: “Defendant’s attorney was permitted to make a statement to the jury and began, after he had made a few remarks, the State objected to him proceeding because the statement was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Moseley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Winfrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
3Cited by37 opinions
- Ryan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Williamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Straight v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Holmes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.