Legal Opinion

Sue v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 6, 1907No. 3829PublishedCited by 37 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

This is a conviction for murder in the second degree, the punishment assessed being twenty-five years confinement in the State -penitentiary.

Appellant’s bill of exceptions, No. 5, complains that the court refused to permit his counsel to make a statement to the jury of the facts that he expected to prove on the trial of this cause. Appended to the bill of exceptions is the following qualification: “Defendant’s attorney was permitted to make a statement to the jury and began, after he had made a few remarks, the State objected to him proceeding because the statement was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Moseley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Winfrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Ryan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Williamson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Straight v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  5. Holmes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API