Legal Opinion
Sterling v. Taylor
California Supreme Court
Decided March 1, 2007No. S121676PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
55 Cal.Rptr.3d 116 (2007)
40 Cal.4th 757
152 P.3d 420
Rochelle STERLING et al. Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
Lawrence N. TAYLOR et al., Defendants and Respondents.
No. S121676.
Supreme Court of California.
March 1, 2007.
Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, Carl L. Grumer, Craig S. Rutenberg, Los Angeles, Jeffrey A. Backhus; Barak Lurie, Santa Monica; Law Offices of Dennis C. Tulsiak and Dennis C. Tulsiak, Los Angeles, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
June Babiracki Barlow and Neil Kalin, Los Angeles, for California Association of Realtors as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants.
Horvitz & Levy,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Seaman's Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Kahn v. East Side Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- California Lettuce Growers, Inc. v. Union Sugar Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
- Freeman & Mills, Inc. v. Belcher Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Patel v. LIEBERMENSCHCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007