Legal Opinion
Bogie v. Paws Chicago
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 15, 2012No. 12 C 5887PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JAMES F. HOLDERMAN, Chief Judge:
Plaintiff Robert Bogie alleges in a five-count complaint that defendants PAWS Chicago and its employees Rochelle Michalek, Heather Newcomb, and Shannon Gillen, failed to hire him because he is a man. (Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”).) Bogie alleges sexual discrimination (Count I) and retaliation (Count II) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17, “contract fraud” (Count III), intentional infliction of emotional distress (Count IV), and negligent infliction of emotional distress (Count V). Currently…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Christopher Lekas v. Kenneth BrileyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- MG Design Associates, Corp. v. CoStar Realty Information, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Andreasik v. Hunt, Gather, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2024
- Papenfuss v. Butitta Brothers Automotive, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019