Life Concepts, Inc. v. Harden
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
562 So.2d 726 (1990)
LIFE CONCEPTS, INC., et al., Appellants,
v.
David HARDEN, et al., Appellees.
No. 89-847.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
April 26, 1990.
Rehearing Denied June 20, 1990.
John W. Foster and Paul L. SanGiovanni of Baker & Hostetler, Orlando, for appellants.
Frederic B. O'Neal, Orlando, for appellees.
GOSHORN, Judge.
In this case, the trial court entered a summary judgment finding that section 7.3(9)(c)(1) of the City of Apopka Zoning Code is unconstitutionally vague and therefore unenforceable. Because we find that the operative language has a plain and ordinary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gardner v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- DeSisto College, Inc. v. Town of Howey-In-The-HillsDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1989
- Effie, Inc. v. City of OcalaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Scullock v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- DeSisto College, Inc. v. LineCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rolling Pines Ltd. Partnership v. City of Little RockCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
- Nostimo, Inc. v. City of ClearwaterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- City of Melbourne v. Hess Realty Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
- Konikov v. Orange County, FloridaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
- Rectory Park, L.C. v. City of Delray BeachDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.