Pester Refining Co. v. Ethyl Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOKEN, Circuit Judge.
Pester Refining Company, a reorganized Chapter 11 debtor, appeals the district court’s1 post-confirmation money judgment to satisfy Ethyl Corporation’s priority claim under § 2-702 of the Uniform Commercial Code and § 546(c) of the Bankrupt*844cy Code to reclaim goods sold to Pester while insolvent. Ethyl cross appeals, arguing that the district court should have awarded post-judgment interest from the date Pester’s Plan of Reorganization was confirmed. We modify the bankruptcy court’s denial of interest and otherwise affirm.
I. The Factual Setting
On February 19 and 22,1985,…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Stowers v. MahonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- In Re Rawson Food Service, Inc., Debtor. Flav-O-Rich, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Rawson Food Service, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Michelin Tires (Canada) Ltd. v. First National Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Total Petroleum, Inc. v. Gary J. Davis, D/B/A Gary J. Davis Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Pester Refining Company, Debtor. Pester Refining Company v. Ethyl Corporation, in Re Pester Refining Company, Debtor. Pester Refining Company v. Ethyl Corporation, the Official Unsecured Creditors Committee, Intervenor Below. In Re Pester Refining Company, Debtor. Pester Refining Company v. Ethyl Corporation, the Official Unsecured Creditors Committee, Intervenor BelowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- In re PorterUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013
- InRe: Pittsburgh-Can v.Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Yenkin-Majestic Paint Corp. v. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. (In Re Pittsburgh-Canfield Corp.)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2004